Legal Opinion

Garretson v. Clark

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York

Decided July 15, 1878PublishedCited by 8 opinions

[This was a bill in equity by Oliver S. Gar-retson against Charles B. Clark and others for the alleged infringement of certain patents.]

1Opinion of the Court

BLATCHFORD, Circuit Judge.

The bill in this case is founded on two patents. One of them [No. 54,860] was granted to Charles B. Clark and Oliver S. Garretson, May 22d, 1866, for an “improved mop-head.” The specification states that the invention consists (1) “in the combination of a collar provided with wings, or their equivalent, which carry the movable jaw, and an adjusting nut with which it is connected by means of a flange and lugs, with a threaded shank and fixed cross-head;” and (2) “in the manner of connecting the wire-frame, which constitutes the movable jaw, with the arms of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Garretson v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Metallic Rubber Tire Co. v. Hartford Rubber Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  2. Coy v. PerkinsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1882
  3. Maimin v. Union Special Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
  4. Seeger Refrigerator Co. v. American Car & Foundry Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1914
  5. Everest v. Buffalo Lubricating Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API