Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Leslie Equipment Co. v. Wood Resources Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 2009No. 34712Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDavis, J.

In this case, the trial court denied the appellants’ motion to set aside a default judgment. The majority opinion concluded that service of process on the appellants under Rule 4(e)(2) of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure was invalid because service of process had to be made pursuant to W.Va. Code § 56-3-33 (2008) (Supp.2009). I concur in this finding. However, for the reasons set out below, I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion’s analysis and ultimate disposition of the case.

DISCUSSION

The basis of my dissent rests on three grounds. First, I disagree with the majority…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Fie Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. Gardemal v. Westin Hotel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  3. Murphy v. SmallridgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Parsons v. Consolidated Gas Supply Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Bennett v. WarnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API