Legal Opinion · Dissent

Caulkins v. Crabtree

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 6, 1995No. CR 94-153Published

1DissentTom Glaze, Justice

I dissent. Whether Mr. Caulkins was unavailable or whether the state made a diligent, good-faith effort to bring him to trial are dependent upon disputed facts. Caulkins testified he had moved, changed addresses, disconnected his phone and never told Arkansas authorities of these changes, even though he made two appearances in court in Arkansas after his move. Caulkins’ new residence was one with all utility bills paid. While he made the foregoing move and changes without telling Arkansas authorities, Caulkins claimed Texas authorities still could have determined his new address since he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gran v. HaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Lowery, Adm'r v. Steel, ChancellorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Ellison v. LangstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Fletcher v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API