Legal Opinion

Hillebrand v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1956No. 40,227PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court in favor of defendant board of county commissioners as a board, and as individuals, against plaintiffs who had claimed in the action before that court that such board was arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable in permitting a change in zoning of certain property as recommended by the Mission township zoning board of Johnson county.

The pleadings will not be set out in detail since the record shows that the only order made by the trial court in ruling on a motion to strike could not have…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Bourgeois v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Konitz v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. State v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  5. Spencer v. SupernoisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bodine v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Keeney v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  3. Hudson, Administrator v. TuckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  4. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Unruh v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API