Legal Opinion

Kraft v. Spencer Tucker Sales, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1952No. 31861PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.

A. J. Kraft brought this action against Spencer Tucker Sales, Inc., to recover twenty-eight hundred dollars. He had deposited this sum on the purchase price of a new Tucker automobile. The purchase could not be completed because Tucker 'automobiles have never been available for delivery. Defendant denied liability on the ground that the deposit had been made with one Henry E. Spencer, individually, and was therefore not the obligation of the corporation.

Early in 1947, Spencer was the sole proprietor of a used car and automobile repair business located at 1606 North First street, Yakima,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dent v. FoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. McArthur v. Times Printing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Marshall v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  4. Ellison v. Jackson Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Mooney v. Mooney Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hendricks v. LakeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  2. C. & H. CONTRACTORS, INC. v. McKeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  3. Fritts v. McKayWashington Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API