Lowenfeld v. Curtis

Motion to Vacate Stay.

(January 8, 1896.)

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

While the affidavits and papers submitted indicate that every other question in controversy is vehemently disputed, they show conclusively that defendants’ only title to the play comes under the contract with the complainant, and, as such, is to be exercised in conformity to the terms of that contract. The weight of evidence so far adduced shows nonapproval of the cast, or, at least, of defendant Curtis in the title roll. The present stay will therefore be continued until hearing and decision of the main motion) but as complainant…