Legal Opinion

Berg v. Auto Wheel Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 19, 1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Aside from factual issues relating to the scope and nature of the alleged agreement for payment of plaintiff’s legal services, the record discloses a serious question of the interpretation and meaning, as well as the intention of the contracting parties in their use of the words, “ trade fixtures ” which were part of the clause limiting the purchaser’s liability to assume payment of certain of seller’s obligations. This is espeeally so in light of the fact that plaintiff drew the agreement which forms the basis of this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lachs v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Piedmont Hotel Co. v. A. E. Nettleton Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Alexander v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Italian Benevolent Institute v. Elaine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bray Terminals, Inc. v. Grand Union Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Boulter Carting Co. v. De PernoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API