Legal Opinion

Union Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Carter

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 24, 1932No. 41417PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

The plaintiff purported to begin its foreclosure action on the 4th day of September, 1931. It filed its petition, which was in all respects regular. It prayed an enforcement of the receivership -clause and prayed possession of the mortgaged property during the year of redemption. It caused the Clerk to comply with all the requirements of Sections 11092 and 11093 of the Code, whereby a notice of Us pendens was imparted to third parties. ■ It also placed in the hands of the sheriff for service an original notice. This notice proved to be defective in form, in that it notified the defendants to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fisher v. ShropshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Boals v. ShulesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  3. Pendy v. ColeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. Haws v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  5. Haverly v. AlcottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Krueger v. LynchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  2. Summerlott v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  3. Andrew v. HaagSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  4. Sutton v. SchnackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  5. First Trust Joint Stock Land Bank v. JansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API