Legal Opinion
In re Shell Oil Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 28, 1991No. 91-2044PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:
The petitioners, defendants in state court lawsuits consolidated after removal to the district court, seek a writ of mandamus concerning the district court granting the plaintiffs’ remand motion. We GRANT the petition and VACATE the remand order.
I
In a companion case, In re Shell Oil Co., et al., 932 F.2d 1518, discussed infra, we reviewed a similar remand order under the 1988 amendments to one of the removal statutes, 28 U.S.C. § 1447, and held that the plaintiffs had waived their objection to the removal by failing to file a motion for remand within 30 days of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Browning v. NavarroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In re Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Victor C. Baris v. Sulpicio Lines, Inc., Caltex Petroleum, Inc., Caltex Petroleum Corporation, and Caltex Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- In Re 1994 Exxon Chemical FireCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- In re Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- James G. Hamilton v. Aetna Life and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Cobb v. Delta Exports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.