Legal Opinion

Abinoja v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 9, 1968No. Nos. 16326-16333, 16476-16479PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

These several petitioners appeal from orders of the Immigration and Naturalization Service denying them adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. § 1255. They are represented by the same attorney and the several appeals present a common question: whether citizens of the Philippines, admitted as non-immigrants 1 for further training in medical professions, are entitled, because the Philippine government has released them from any obligation to return to that country, to a change of status to permanent residents without returning to the Philippines “for an aggregate of at least two years” as…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carmelita Teves Carriaga v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  2. Priscilla Villanueva Tuazon v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Remedios B. Abinoja, Juliana B. Bautista, Carina Derla Drilon, Eduardo Reyes Estacio, Arceli A. Kalalo, Edna T. Paredes, Salud U. Rodriquez, and Luz B. Yap v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Milagros T. Aquino, Minerva Diric Bactat, Severino M. Deasis, and Teresita Vendiola Revina v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API