People v. Staropoli
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that the expert’s testimony concerning child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome impermissibly bolstered the testimony of the complainant is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, there is no merit to the contention (see People v Carroll, 95 NY2d 375, 387 [2000]; People v Taylor, 75 NY2d 277, 288 [1990] ).
The defendant’s contentions regarding the disqualification of two prospective jurors are without merit. The determination that a prospective juror should be disqualified before voir dire is a matter for the court, and a defendant has…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. VelascoNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. Jean-MarieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. CarforaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.