Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Price

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 21, 1955PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BáRNHill, C. J.

The appellants in their oral argument rested their case squarely on the contention that the judgment by default final entered in 1944 is void, and that, therefore, they are not barred by lapse of time. Monroe v. Niven, 221 N.C. 362, 20 S.E. 2d 311. This contention cannot be sustained. Where a judge enters a judgment by default final when the complaint will not support anything more than a judgment by default and inquiry, the judgment is irregular and voidable— not void — at the election of the defendants. Ellis v. Ellis, 190 N.C. 418, 130 S.E. 7; Finger v. Smith, 191 N.C. 818,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Monroe v. NivenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Ellis v. EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Ellis v. . EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Finger v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Hinton v. . WhitehurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Menzel v. MenzelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API