Legal Opinion

Flakall Corp. v. Krause

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1955PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The motion of the respondent Flakall Corporation to dismiss the appeal of the appellants is hereby granted because of the contumacious contempt of appellants in defying the in junctional provisions of the judgment appealed from, without complying with the conditions for a stay imposed by the trial court. Authority for such dismissal is afforded by Arnold v. Nat. Union of Marine Cooks, etc. (1953), 42 Wash. (2d) 648, 257 Pac. (2d) 629, affirmed in (1954), 348 U. S. 37, 75 Sup. Ct. 92, 99 L. Ed. 46.

We consider the defense, that it is Flake Food Corporation, a Georgia corporation, whose acts…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. National Union of Marine Cooks & Stewards v. ArnoldSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pilgrim Food Products Co. v. Filler Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Knutson v. KnutsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Schafer v. SchaferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State v. Advance Marketing Consultants, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Fort Howard Paper Co. v. Fort Howard Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API