Matchok v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
Matehok and Dulleek were indicted, tried, and convicted for possessing and passing counterfeited money with intent to defraud, in violation of section 265, title 18, USCA. On appeal they assign numerous errors. The first is the court’s refusal (at the beginning of the trial) to hold the counts bad in that they do not charge offenses against the United States. True, they fail to do so in precise words; yet they clearly charge such offenses by force of the facts alleged. The defendants could not possibly mistake their meaning or suffer any uncertainty as to the offenses…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. CarllSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- In Re GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Woodruff v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas · 1893
- Gallagher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1906
3Cited by9 opinions
- Little v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Cook v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
- Stumbo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- United States v. RuffinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- United States v. GilbertDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.