Legal Opinion

Ross E. Thomas & Sons v. Axtell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 15, 1924No. 12638PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

STEPHENSON, C.

It appears that both parties ' to this action had been engaged in the sale and handling of real estate on commission. S- C. Axtell alleges a customer came to his office for the purpose of purchasing a home. The plaintiff did not have suitable property and he took the proposed purchaser to the office of the defendant with the view of making an arrangement to sell the proposed purchaser a piece of property through the defendant. In this relation an answer of the plaintiff is in part as follows:

“We went finally to Mr. Thomas and introduced myself and told him that I had a…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amons v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Jones v. MajorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. First State Bank of Inola v. DickersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API