Attocknie v. Carpenter Manufacturing, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HANSEN, Presiding Judge:
Appellants, Richard and Chery Attocknie, as Guardians of Carla Attocknie, and Richard and Chery Attocknie, individually, seek review of the trial court’s order which denied their motion for new trial, reconsideration and re-examination. Appellants sought reconsideration by the trial court of its order which sustained in part, the summary judgment motions of Appellees, Carpenter Manufacturing, Inc., Carpenter Body Works, Inc., and Beuford Keas Bus Sales, Inc., (collectively Carpenter). This appeal is submitted for our review under Rule 1.203, Rules of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Greenwood Trust Company v. Commonwealth of MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Jennifer Stamps v. Collagen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Patricia M. Wood v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gaines-Tabb v. ICI Explosives, USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Jackson v. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Wilson v. PleasantIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Allenberg v. Bentley Hedges Travel Serv. Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Moody v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.