Legal Opinion

Lipscombe v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 18, 1949No. [H.C. No. 2, October Term, 1949.]Published

1Opinion of the Court

This is an application for leave to appeal from the refusal of a writ of habeas corpus.

The petitioner alleges that he was not advised of his right to have witnesses summoned and that he was not permitted to have or get in touch with an attorney. The fact that he was not advised of his right to have witnesses summoned cannot be inquired into on a writ of habeas corpus. He alleges no facts to support his allegation that he was not permitted to have or get in touch with an attorney but simply makes that bare allegation. State ex rel.Williams v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 190 Md. 762,60…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rountree v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  2. State Ex Rel. Williams v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API