Legal Opinion

In re Multidistrict Litigation Involving Deering Milliken Patent

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided August 21, 1970No. 49PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

STANLEY A. WEIGEL, Judge of the Panel.

The eases included in this proceeding involve (1) Deering Milliken Research Corporation (hereinafter DMRC) which is purportedly the exclusive United States licensee of a variety of French patents and (2) fourteen of DMRC’s sublicensees. The license agreements cover patented processes for endowing fiber with a “false twist” which gives yarn stretch and bulk.

Following the Supreme Court decision in Lear, Inc. v. Adkins, 395 U.S. 653, 89 S.Ct. 1902, 23 L.Ed.2d 610 (1969), DM RC and the fourteen sublicensees have become involved in litigation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. In Re Multidistrict Civil Actions Arising From the Air Crash DisasterUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Government Auto Fleet SalesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
  2. In re CBS Color Tube Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
  3. In re Deering Milliken Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1979
  4. In re Trade Secrets in Manufacturing High Molecular Weight PolyethyleneUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API