In re Multidistrict Litigation Involving Deering Milliken Patent
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
STANLEY A. WEIGEL, Judge of the Panel.
The eases included in this proceeding involve (1) Deering Milliken Research Corporation (hereinafter DMRC) which is purportedly the exclusive United States licensee of a variety of French patents and (2) fourteen of DMRC’s sublicensees. The license agreements cover patented processes for endowing fiber with a “false twist” which gives yarn stretch and bulk.
Following the Supreme Court decision in Lear, Inc. v. Adkins, 395 U.S. 653, 89 S.Ct. 1902, 23 L.Ed.2d 610 (1969), DM RC and the fourteen sublicensees have become involved in litigation…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In Re Multidistrict Civil Actions Arising From the Air Crash DisasterUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Government Auto Fleet SalesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
- In re CBS Color Tube Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
- In re Deering Milliken Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1979
- In re Trade Secrets in Manufacturing High Molecular Weight PolyethyleneUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972