Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Seaboard Air Line Railroad v. Hawkins

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 21, 1968No. 43401, 43402Published

1ConcurrencePannell, Judge

While I agree with the conclusion reached in Division 1 of the opinion, I cannot agree with the rule of law set forth therein as it is stated for the reason that a necessary element of the rule is omitted. The intimation in Division 1 is that there is no longer a procedure for objecting to an amendment upon the ground that the amendment does not meet the ruling on demurrer. Prior to the Civil *799Practice Act (which has abolished demurrers in all the courts of this state which are courts of record) where demurrers, either general or special, were sustained with leave to amend and the order…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Folsom v. HowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. Smith v. BuggCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  3. Speer v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  4. Peacock Construction Co. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  5. Perkins v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API