Legal Opinion

Pearson v. City of Louisville

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1989No. 58340PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PITTMAN, Justice,

for the Court:

This case involves the construction of a reverter clause in a deed and whether or not the clause was triggered by an act of the Illinois Central Gulf Railroad. The City of Louisville sued Roy Pearson and the Illinois Central Gulf Railroad, alleging that the Railroad, in deeding the property in controversy to Pearson, had abandoned the property, thus triggering the reverter clause and causing the property to revert to the City, the original grantor. After a trial, the chancellor found in favor of the City of Louisville. Pearson has appealed to this Court,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hathorn v. Illinois Cent. Gulf R. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Lakeview Traction Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  3. City of Laurel v. PowersMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  4. New Orleans Great Northern R. Co. v. HathornMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Burnham v. City of JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Conservatorship of the Estate of Moor ex rel. Moor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2010
  2. City of Jackson v. Rebuild America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API