Legal Opinion

Willi v. Schaefer Hitchcock Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1933No. 5943Published

1Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING.

Appellant’s petition for a rehearing urges that before respondents may recover it must be proved that Mr. Willi’s presence in the automobile (conceding though not admitting that the trip, so far as Mr. Bruce was concerned, was on company business) was connected with the business of appellant’s predecessor company. Respondents were asked to reply to such contention, but no authorities have been cited on the point by either side.

From the following authorities, the rule is that it is a question of the agent’s right or authority to invite a guest to ride, not the nature…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stout v. LewisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Fedden v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  3. Nash v. Longville Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  4. R. B. Tyler Co. v. Kirby's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  5. Paiewonsky v. JoffeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API