Muscatine County v. Oliver
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Muscatine District Court. — IIon. Wm. Theophilius, Judge. Action at law upon a supersedeas bond. Judgment for plaintiff for a part of the recovery demanded. Both parties, have appealed; but the plaintiff, having first perfected its appeal, will alone be denominated the appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, C. J.
The facts are not in dispute. One Seidlitz, having been found guilty in the district court upon a charge of contempt in violating the terms of a liquor injunction theretofore entered against him, was adjudged to pay a fine of $500 and costs, and that he be imprisoned in the county jail for a term of ninety days. To obtain a review of the record in that Case, and to annul said judgment against him, Seidlitz sued out a writ of certiorari from this court; and, to stay or- supersede the enforcement of said judgment pending the hearing upon certiorari, he filed a bond in the penal sum of $1,000,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. MouldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Brown & Bennett v. PowersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Ela v. WelchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
- Harris v. Kansas Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Washburne v. LufkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MarquardtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Van Buren County v. BradfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- State v. GregorySupreme Court of Iowa · 1927