Legal Opinion

Erdman v. Stahlnecker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1825PublishedCited by 3 opinions

IN ERROR. This case came before the court, on a writ of error to the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery county. who Cited Scott v. Israel, 2 Binn. 145. Purviance v. Dry den, 3 Serg. & Bawle, 405. JDilman v. Shultz, 5 Serg. & Bawle, 36. Jackson v. Waitman, 1 Cowen, 177. Kimmel v. Kimmel, 5 Serg. & Bawle, 294. Lentz V. Stroh, 6 Serg. & Bawle, 36.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Tilghman, C. J.

The only question in this ease, is, whether a judgment was entered in the. Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh county, for Adam Stahlnecker against Andrew Erdman. On that point, the evidence was as follows: A writ of summons was issued for Adam Stahlnecker against Abel Fowler and Andrew *326Erdman, io May term, 1830, to which the sheriff made return, “ summoned as to Abel Fowler, non est to Andrew Erdman?* The name oí John Evans, (attorney at law,) was entered in the margin of the docket, opposite to the names of the defendants. On the 10th of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bull v. TowsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
  2. Compher v. AnawaltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  3. Mosher v. SmallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API