Legal Opinion
Altamore v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 21, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendant Aetna Casualty and Surety Company has a duty to reimburse the plaintiff for legal expenses incurred in defending an action entitled Long Is. Typographical Union, Local 915, I.T.U. v Altamore, pursuant to the plaintiff’s homeowner’s insurance policy, the plaintiff appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), dated June 20, 1996, which granted the motion of the defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2) as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Allstate Insurance v. MugaveroNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- A. Meyers & Sons Corp. v. Zurich American Insurance GroupNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Monter v. CNA Insurance CompaniesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- New York City Transit Authority v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pagano v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Malek v. Allcity InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Allstate Insurance v. HereghtyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998