Goldman v. State

HAWKINS,Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted on complaint and information which alleged that he did, on March 18, 1941, prescribe whisky for Ralph.' Rash for other than medicinal purposes. The fine assessed was $200.00.

A timely motion to quash the State’s pleading was presented predicated on the contention that it was not alleged that appellant was a physician. The averment was: “ * * * B. B. Goldman, a physician, licensed to practice medicine in this State, * * To support his contention appellant cites West v. State, 51 S. W. 247. There it was averred that accused “as a regular practicing…