Legal Opinion

Schoonover v. Rowe

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1844PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the La Grange Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

— Slander by Rowe against Schoonover. The defendant pleaded the general issue and two special pleas. As no question arises on the special pleas, it is not necessary to state them particularly. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff

On the trial, the plaintiff proved the speaking of the words as laid in the declaration ; — he also proved the speaking of the same words after the commencement of the suit.

The Court instructed the jury, that they had a right to not only infer malice from the words spoken since the commencement of the suit, but that they had a right, and it was then-duty, to take…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. M'Glemery v. KellerIndiana Supreme Court · 1834

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Meyer v. BohlfingIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Barker v. PrizerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Forbes v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  4. Hesler v. DegantIndiana Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Roberts v. WardIndiana Supreme Court · 1847

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API