Legal Opinion

Joe Reinertson, Inc. v. Nelson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 11, 1964No. 63-335PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant was defendant in the trial court and it appeals a final judgment upon a jury verdict. Two points are presented:(1) Whether the evidence was insufficient to sustain a finding of apparent authority of defendant’s alleged agent.(2) Whether the court improperly charged the jury when it returned the first time with a blank verdict.

On the first point we think that the evidence is sufficient upon the question of agency in that the jury could have found that the agent was clothed with apparent authority to modify the contract because of his position as the sole contact between plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Sarasota CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
  2. Nelson v. Cravero Constructors, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Tampa Sand & Material Company v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  4. Simon v. SimonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Financial Fire & Cas. Co. v. SOUTHMOST VEG. COOP. ASS'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  2. Sharpsteen ex rel. Sharpsteen v. KeeslerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  3. Jim Walter Corp. v. BrachtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API