Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Sotak v. Sotak

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 7, 1969PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Chief Justice.

The question is: What damages are recoverable under a supersedeas bond?

*491In Sotak v. Sotak, Ky., 420 S.W.2d 567, the judgment dividing certain property between the parties here following a divorce was affirmed. Elizabeth G. Sotak had executed a supersedeas bond and had retained possession of certain property, including life insurance policies upon the life of Michael Joseph Sotak having cash values totaling $13,296.68, a Buick car worth $2,500, and stock in Canada Dry Corporation worth $17,475. Upon affirmance, Michael Joseph Sotak was denied any recovery for damages…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. Clay's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Moss v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962
  3. Baker v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962
  4. Beckman v. Time Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
  5. Solter v. Sandy Valley Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1986
  2. Sharp v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974
  3. Sharp v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  4. Strunk v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2013
  5. Young & Simon, Inc. v. BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API