Legal Opinion

Dumas v. Labonte

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 24, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBBER, Justice.

The plaintiffs were awarded jury verdicts for damages in these companion cases arising from an intersection collision of two automobiles. A motion in each case for judgment for the defendant n.o.v. was denied. The issue on appeal is whether or not the plaintiff driver was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

“It is well settled that a verdict should not be ordered for the defendant by the trial Court when, taking the most favorable view of the plaintiff’s evidence, including every justifiable inference, different conclusions may be fairly drawn from the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dansky v. KotimakiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1925
  2. McMann v. Reliable Furniture Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
  3. Gregware v. PoliquinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937
  4. Crockett v. StaplesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  5. Howe v. HoudeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parker v. HohmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
  2. Bodick v. Harcliff Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Donovan v. LuceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API