Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Haldeman

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 12, 1976No. Nos. 75-1381, 75-1382, 75-1384 and 76-1441Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMacKINNON, Circuit Judge

My views concur with those expressed in the majority opinion, in which I have participated, except with respect to the issues of pretrial publicity and the convictions on Count 2.

PRETRIAL PUBLICITY

If ever in the history of our country there was a criminal case which by law had to be transferred to another place for trial because of prejudicial pretrial publicity a lone, this is that case. When this case was before us prior to trial, I stated that the venue should have been changed to some place other than the District of Columbia. I adhere to that position. The trial court here denied a…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API