Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Murphy
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 14, 1965PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.
Applications under calendar numbers 117 and 104 of the same date are consolidated herein with the application under calendar number 103 and decided together.
Each of the petitioners, by way of an article 78 proceeding, invokes the judicial power to annul his dismissal from the Police Department of the City of New York, to order his reinstatement to the position from which he was discharged and to order the payment of his appropriate interim compensation and, in the case of petitioner Koutnik, to order corollary relief.
The manner and nature of the dismissal of each petitioner is best portrayed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Wieman v. UpdegraffSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Slochower v. Board of Higher Ed. of New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Laino v. Warden of Wallkill PrisonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Conlon v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Kugler v. TillerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Fiorella v. Village of ScarsdaleNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- Holland v. HoganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967