Legal Opinion

AAA Parking, Inc. v. Black

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 27, 1964No. 40916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

Code § 12-103 requires bailees “to exercise care and diligence in protecting and keeping safely the thing bailed.” Code § 12-104 provides that “after proof of loss, the burden of proof is on the bailee to show proper diligence.” The bailor, “setting up a breach of the duty may elect as to his remedy, and rely upon either his right under the contract or proceed for damages as in a case of tort.” Parker Motor Co. v. Spiegal, 33 Ga. App. 795, 796 (127 SE 797).

Where the bailor elects to proceed in an action in tort, is he required, as against a special demurrer, to allege specific…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ellison v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Hudgins v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Milton v. MiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Parker Motor Co. v. SpiegalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  5. Richter Bros. v. Atlantic Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. Five Points Parking CenterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. A.A.A. Parking, Inc. v. BiggerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Bunn v. Broadway Parking Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Shingler Motors, Inc. v. WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Brown v. Five Points Parking CenterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API