United States v. Mario B. And Joseph L. Capano
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
Equity skimming is the practice of diverting revenues generated by mortgaged property in default to purposes other than property maintenance or mortgage payments. This case presents the question whether a federal criminal statute, 12 U.S.C. § 1715z-4(b) (1982), which -proscribes equity skimming from federally-assisted multifamily housing projects, applies although the mortgagor did not receive an extension of time to cure the default or a modification of the mortgage terms. We hold that it does not, and we therefore will affirm the judgment of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Michael Robert Laykin, United States of America v. Dennis Lee CrainCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. James Hughes Cheape, John Wade Johnson, Karen Klinefelter. Appeal of Karen KlinefelterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Golden Acres, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
- People v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Ward v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.