Legal Opinion

People v. Parker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We agree with the suppression court that the police had probable cause to pursue and arrest defendant. An officer received a description of the suspect over the police radio and from the victim (see, People v Sekoll, *927254 AD2d 797); the victim pointed out defendant, who was walking along the street, as the person who robbed him (see, People v Grant, 254 AD2d 700); and defendant fled when the pursuing officer directed him to stop (see, People v Lindsay, 249 AD2d 937, lv denied 92 NY2d 900). The bargained-for sentence is neither unduly harsh nor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SekollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. People v. LindsayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. People v. GrantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. CoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. People v. WallerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API