Legal Opinion

Fox v. Hempfield R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1857No. Case No. 5,010PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIER, Circuit Justice.

The meaning of this clause cannot be doubted, notwithstanding its rather awkward expression. The parties agree that in case any matter arise between them concerning any matter connected with their agreement, instead of resorting to the legal tribunals for their settlement, they will submit the same to the decision of the engineer, whose award shall be final and conclusive.

If the plaintiff had averred that the matters in dispute had been submitted to the arbitrator, and that he had awarded the sum of $50,000 as damages, there is no doubt he could support an action on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. FenlonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mundy v. Louisville & N. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  2. Clifton, Applegate & Toole v. Big Lake Drain District No. 1Montana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. J. R. Meyers & Co. v. Pacific Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Denver & New Orleans Construction Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API