Dillion v. Crook & Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 17 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM ROCKCASTLE CIRCUIT COURT. CITED 1. Frauds and perjuries: General Statutes, title Contracts.
Read the full summary
Case 17 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM ROCKCASTLE CIRCUIT COURT. CITED 1. Frauds and perjuries: General Statutes, title Contracts. Revised Statutes, chap. 4, secs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Dunlap’s Laws, Penn. chap. 59. Code, Iowa, secs. 1205, 2409, 2410, 2411, 2412. 3 Litt. 393, Finley, &e. v. Wilson. 4 Bihb, 511, McCracken v. Sanders. 5 Litt. 92, MeCamphell v. McCampbell. 6 Mon. 557, Grimes v. Shrieve. 4 J. J. Mar. 230, Gudgell v. Duvall. 5 B. Mon. 269, Clary’s heirs v. Marshall’s heirs. 9 B. Mon. 371, King’s ex’r v. Hanna. 1Met. 557, 558, Berry v. Graddy. 1 Bush, 149, Cornellison v. Cornellison. 7…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE PBYOB
delivered the opinion oe the court.
It is alleged in the petition that the firms of Crook & Co. and Harris & Co., under an agreement with the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, constructed a certain switch from the main road to their coal mines in the county of Rock-castle. The two firms were' to keep the road in repair and pay the railroad company ten per cent on the iron furnished, the latter having agreed to furnish the iron spikes, etc., in order to complete the switch.
It is also alleged that the appellant, having leased coal lands adjoining the lands owned by the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Beinlein v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
- David v. BrokawOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Levy v. Louisville Gunning SystemCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
- E. K. Bonds & Co. v. FordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Jarvis v. SatterwhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.