Legal Opinion

United States v. Brandon Burgess

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 17, 2014No. 13-3571PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TINDER, Circuit Judge.

Brandon Burgess was indicted for possessing a firearm as a convicted felon. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He moved to suppress the gun, which police officers found after stopping a car that he was riding in, arguing that the officers lacked reasonable suspicion to justify the stop. The district court denied his motion, and Burgess preserved his challenge — the only one he raises on appeal — with a conditional plea of guilty. See Fed.R.CRIm.P. 11(a)(2).

There was some confusion in the testimony given by the police officers at the suppression hearing, which we will discuss…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Florida v. JLSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. United States v. BullockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  2. United States v. Terrill Rickmon, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  3. State v. Avan Rondell NimmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State v. Avan Rondell NimmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API