Legal Opinion

Lawrence Woodard v. Mulicenik

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided May 27, 2020No. 4:20-cv-01570Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Lawrence Woodard, # 052606-084, ) Civil Action No. 4:20-1570-RMG Petitioner, v. ORDER AND OPINION Warden, Edgefield FCI, Respondent. oo) Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R & R’”) that Petitioner’s

28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. (Dkt. No. 21.) For the reasons set forth below, the R & R is adopted as the order of the Court and the§ 2241 petition is denied without prejudice. 1. Background In 1997, Petitioner Lawrence Woodard was sentenced for convictions under 21…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. David E. Camby v. Larry Davis James M. LesterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Gerald WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  4. In Re Avery W. Vial, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  5. Rice v. RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API