Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Jones

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 27, 1939No. 14,530PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hilliard

A suit for an accounting on a written contract set forth in an amended complaint. The right to maintain the suit was challenged by demurrer on the ground that the contract was contrary to public policy and void. The demurrer was sustained, and plaintiff, electing to stand on his pleading, suffered judgment of dismissal. Omitting formal opening and closing, the amended complaint reads:

“First: That the defendant is now and during all of the times hereinafter mentioned has been a licensed architect, duly licensed to practice his profession in the State of Colorado.
“Second: That the plaintiff was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Valdes v. LarrinagaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Russell v. Courier Printing & Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  3. Oliver v. WilderColorado Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Good v. AB Chance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Superior Oil Co. v. Western Slope Gas Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1982
  3. Colorado Springs Teachers Ass'n v. School District No. 11Colorado Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Finance & Investment Co. v. UMA, L.L.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API