Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided November 6, 1987No. Appeal 85-1882, 85-1933Published

1Dissent

BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge,

dissenting in part, with whom COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge, and EDWARD S. SMITH and PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judges, join.

I agree with the majority that the district court’s finding of no literal infringement of the ’628 patent claims has not been shown to be clearly erroneous. However, I believe that the district court failed to consider the doctrine of equivalents issue in accord with the precedents of both this court and the Supreme Court. The in banc majority in this case, in affirming the district court, does not follow the precedents of this court. While the…

2Cases cited133 opinions

  1. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API