Legal Opinion

Pittsburg, Cincinnati, & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Hennigh

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1872PublishedCited by 18 opinions

APPEAL from the Delaware Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

This was an action by the appellee against the appellant to recover damages for the ejection of the plaintiff from the railway carriage of the defendant by her agent and servant, the conductor of a train, at the town of Windfall, in the State of Indiana, the plaintiff having purchased a ticket at Chicago for passage from that place to New Castle, in the State of Indiana.

Issue, trial, verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for five hundred dollars. No question was made on the pleadings. The defendant moved for a new trial, and filed the following reasons: “first, the verdict of the jury is not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Snodgrass v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Horton v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Barnard v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Medler v. HiattIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Ham v. CarrollIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. FixIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Jerome v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1876
  3. Northern Pac. R. v. PausonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1895
  4. Hall v. Memphis & Charleston R.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1882
  5. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API