In re the Estate of Smith
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Sheils, S.
The executors have filed an answer in which it is alleged that, in the probate proceedings herein, the petitioner was a necessary witness to the probate of the will and testified as such to secure its probate; that, by reason thereof, the legacy of $3,000, given to her in a codicil to the said will, is void by virtue of section 27 of the Decedent Estate Law; and that the petitioner is not interested in the estate or entitled to the payment of any legacy or to compel an accounting by the executors.
The facts are these: On July 24, 1935, the decedent, a resident of Yonkers, N. Y.,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re the Probate of the Will of DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- In Re of Proving the Last Will & Testament of CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- In re Proving the Last Will & Testament & Codicil Thereto of EmmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Bloodgood v. . LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re the Estate of KuraltMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- In re the Estate of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- In re the Estate of PhillipNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of MarksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Russell v. LippsNorfolk County Circuit Court · 2004