Legal Opinion
Stiles v. Seagraves
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 8, 1971No. 46090PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff in a personal injury action appeals from the judgment.
1. Enumerations of error 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 are without merit as no objection was made before verdict. Biddinger v. Fletcher, 116 Ga. App. 532 (157 SE2d 764); Bryant v. Chasteen, 121 Ga. App. 446 (174 SE2d 192).
2. Enumerations of error 8, 9, 10 and 11 are also without merit. The trial judge is not required to give a requested charge in the exact language requested where the propositions therein stated are substantially and correctly covered by the general charge of the court. Srochi v. Kamensky, 121 Ga. App.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hardwick v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Atlanta Gas Light Company v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Srochi v. KamenskyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Biddinger v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Howard v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Robertson v. Georgia Power CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Ruffin v. BristolCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972