Lindner v. Hine
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. (Cobb, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings ei’ror. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.
Schucker & Hopp were the owners of a stock of liquors, and gave Gustave Hine. a chattel mortgage thereon. Afterwards they obtained a policy of insurance ixpon the stock from the People’s Insurance Company, the loss, if any, payable to Hine, as his mortgage interest might appear. A fire occurred, which consumed the property insured. The plaintiffs had been the attoi’neys of Schucker & ‘Hopp in some litigation which they had before that time had, and the plaintiffs made out the proofs of loss. The insux-ance company denied liability, and Schucker & Hopp thereupon assigned their claim under the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Weeks v. Wayne Circuit JudgesMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stewart v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1937