Legal Opinion

Allen v. Brannon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 21, 1966Published

1Per curiam

When considered in relation to the pleadings and the charge, the only reasonable interpretation of the verdict is that the jury found that the collision and all resulting damages were caused by the actionable negligence of defendant and by the actionable negligence of plaintiff. Hence, the verdict supports the judgment. See Nicholson v. Dean, 267 N.C. 375, 148 S.E. 2d 247, and cases cited.

There was no objection by plaintiff to the issues as submitted. Plaintiff, by exceptions to the charge, undertakes to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to warrant submission of the second issue.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nicholson v. DeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API