Legal Opinion
Ringele v. Terteling
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1956No. 8259Published
1Opinion of the Court
305 P.2d 314 (1956)
Dorothy Rorrison RINGELE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
J. W. TERTELING and N. L. Terteling, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of J. A. Terteling and Sons, Defendants-Respondents.
No. 8259.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
February 28, 1956.
On Rehearing December 20, 1956.
E. G. Elliott, James H. Hawley, Boise, for appellant.
Sherman F. Furey, Jr., U. S. Dist. Atty., Boise, Roger P. Marquis, Washington, D. C., amici curiæ, at rehearing.
Donart & Donart, Weiser, for respondents.
PORTER, Justice.
By her second amended complaint, appellant alleges substantially as follows: That at…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Yearsley v. W. A. Ross Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Wooden-Ware Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Watkins v. Siler Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Moore v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Wolfe v. Shell Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.