Legal Opinion

Merritt v. Gibson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1891No. 15,920PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Switzerland Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

McBride', J. —

The question we are required to decide in this case is: When a mortgage on land has been foreclosed^ and the mortgaged land sold to the mortgage creditor on the decretal order, is he entitled, as against the owner of the equity of redemption, to the appointment of a receiver to take *156charge of such land, and collect and hold, subject to the order of the court, rents and profits accruing thereon during the year allowed for redemption thereof, on showing inadequacy of the security and insolvency of the debtor?

Appellant Adolphus E. Merritt owned, and, with his wife and co-appellant,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. CushmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Schreiber v. CareyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Bank of Ogdensburgh v. ArnoldNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
  5. Stephens v. Illinois Mutual Fire InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Markover v. KraussIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Moncrieff v. HareSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  3. World Building, Loan & Investment Co. v. MarlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Federal Land Bank of Louisville v. SchleeterIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Harris v. United States Savings Fund & Investment Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API