Legal Opinion
E. W. Bliss Co. v. Cold Metal Process Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 12, 1940No. 5402PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILKIN, District Judge.
The motion for production of documents under Rule 34, Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, filed by the defendant on July 5, 1939, is sustained, and the request for an order to permit defendant to inspect such documents is granted. The time for such production and inspection is set as March -, 1940. After careful consideration of the arguments for and against the motion, it seems to this court that the purpose or object of the motion is within the spirit and the letter of the New Rules of Civil Procedure. The documents and data requested are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Souffront v. La Compagnie Des Sucreries De Porto RicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- E. W. Bliss Co. v. Cold Metal Process Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Foote v. Parsons Non-Skid Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- Elliott Co. v. Roto Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Radiant Burners, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. American Gas Association, Peoples Gas Light and Coke CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Hickman v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Leach v. Greif Bros. Cooperage Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1942
- Miller v. MIF Realty L.P. (In Re Perrysburg Marketplace Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.