Ferrer v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*397The jury’s verdict in favor of plaintiff is rationally supported by meteorological evidence and plaintiffs testimony showing, inter alia, that there was a four-inch accumulation of snow and ice that had developed prior to the commencement of the snow, freezing rain and plain rain that ended 22 hours before plaintiffs fall, and permitting an inference that plaintiff fell on preexisting ice (see Tubens v New York City Hous. Auth., 248 AD2d 291, 292 [1998]; Seaman v City of New York, 294 AD2d 144 [2002]). Plaintiff, 25 years old at the time of the accident, sustained a fractured right tibia that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tubens v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Alvarado v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Seaman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by4 opinions
- FERGUSON, ASHLEY v. ROCHESTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICTAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Ferguson v. Rochester City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Ferguson v. Rochester City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Golimowski v. Town of CheektowagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020