Legal Opinion

Indemnity Insurance of North America v. Art Students League

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 19, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant Rose was the owner of a painting consigned to defendant ACA Gallery, which, upon its sale, was to receive a commission of 40% of the sale price. Insurance for the painting, "[f]or account of whom it may concern”, was procured by the Museum and sponsor of the exhibit. After the show, and in the course of returning the painting to Rose’s warehouse, the painting was stolen. We agree with the IAS Court that defendant Rose is entitled to the entire $150,000 of proceeds from the insurance policy. The gallery had only a conditional interest in the painting and would earn a commission only…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stainless, Inc. v. Employers Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Stainless, Inc. v. Employers' Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wesselmann v. International Images, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Scher v. Stendhal Gallery, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Wool v. AyresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Scher v. Stendhal Gallery, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API